AmayztechGet in touch

Cybersecurity & Operational Resilience

Keep critical operations secure and resilient.

Protect the services, data and decisions your organization depends on. We help regulators and other control-intensive organizations understand cyber exposure, strengthen security around existing technology, prepare for disruption and turn risk into an actionable improvement plan.

Discuss your resilience priorities
  • Security assessment
  • Identity & access
  • Incident readiness
  • Operational resilience
  • Cyber supervision

From a first structured cybersecurity baseline to targeted improvements in an established security environment.

What we strengthen

Security that protects the operation, not just the infrastructure.

  • Cyber Risk & Maturity Assessments

    Establish what matters most: critical services, sensitive data, attack exposure, policies, third parties and control gaps. Translate the findings into prioritized action and clear ownership.

  • Identity, Access & Information Protection

    Strengthen authentication, privileged access, separation of duties, data handling and protective controls across portals, applications and connected environments.

  • Secure Architecture & Hardening

    Assess and improve cloud, network, application and integration security. Design changes around the technology already in place and the institution's operational constraints.

  • Detection, Incident Response & Recovery

    Improve the path from security events to verified action. Establish response playbooks, logging and escalation, recovery dependencies and practical tabletop exercises.

  • Third-Party & Supply Chain Resilience

    Map essential suppliers, service dependencies, contractual assurance needs, exit constraints and disruption scenarios before a provider becomes a single point of failure.

  • Cyber Supervision & Risk Reporting

    Where within the authority's mandate, design secure incident-intake workflows, supervisory evidence, control assessments, remediation registers and clear management or sector-level reporting.

The operational risk

A cybersecurity program is only as strong as its ability to keep the service running.

A portal may be available, yet its identities, data, integrations, suppliers and recovery procedures can still present material operational exposure.

The goal is not a longer list of tools. It is a clearer answer to what is exposed, what matters, who owns the response and how essential work continues.

Where resilience breaks down

  1. Protection is fragmented

    Identity settings, endpoint controls, cloud permissions, applications and records may each be managed separately. A control gap can sit between systems.

  2. Risks are recorded but not resolved

    Assessments produce findings without named owners, agreed priorities or evidence that remediation worked.

  3. Recovery has not been proved

    Incident plans and backups exist on paper, but essential workflows, data integrity and supplier dependencies have not been tested together.

How we begin

Begin with one essential service.

Select a licensing portal, filing service, supervisory system, reporting process or other high-impact operation. We map the supporting identities, infrastructure, applications, data and suppliers, then recommend what to keep, what to strengthen and what to test.

Practical actions, clear ownership and evidence of improvement before expansion.

Different starting points

Build the foundation. Or make an established program stronger.

A commission with no formalized cyber program should not be sold the same first step as an authority already operating security controls, incident procedures and specialist suppliers.

  • Route 1Starting or formalizing

    Put essential safeguards and accountability in place.

    Start with business-critical services and sensitive information. Identify the control owners, establish a practical risk baseline, prioritize the highest-value safeguards and document how incidents will be escalated, contained and recovered from.

    What the first phase can deliver

    • A critical-service and asset-dependency inventory
    • Baseline risk and gap assessment aligned to an appropriate framework
    • Priority identity, access and data-protection changes
    • Incident and recovery roles, contact paths and tabletop plan
    • A 90-day improvement backlog with accountable owners
    Discuss a foundations review

  • Route 2Existing cybersecurity capability

    Test what already exists and close the gaps that matter.

    Work with the commission's security team, existing service providers and current tools. Examine one critical exposure, improve how detection and response connect, validate third-party dependencies and turn recurring assurance findings into measurable remediation.

    What the first phase can deliver

    • Control and architecture review of a selected service
    • Identity and privileged-access validation
    • Incident simulation and recovery evidence
    • Vendor and concentration-risk assessment
    • Executive risk reporting and repeatable control follow-up
    Discuss a resilience improvement sprint

Neither route assumes that functioning systems, monitoring tools or service-provider contracts must be replaced.

Built for regulatory responsibilities

Protect the commission. Strengthen oversight of the market.

Inside the commission

Protect the authority's own operating environment.

Licensing, filings, casework, correspondence and management reporting depend on sensitive information and connected technology. We help map critical services, strengthen access, secure applications and integrations, assess supplier reliance and prepare continuity responses that work in real operating conditions.

Representative deliverables

  • Portal security review
  • Identity and role mapping
  • Cloud and host configuration assessment
  • Backup and restore test plan
  • Incident playbook
  • Vendor dependency register
  • Control remediation tracking

Across regulated entities

Make cyber supervision more structured and visible.

Where the legal mandate supports it, a regulator may need to ask how firms govern their cyber risk, record significant incidents, assess third-party concentration and follow remediation over time. We can help translate those requirements into proportionate forms, secure submission and review workflows, evidence records, dashboards and auditable supervisory follow-up.

Representative deliverables

  • Institution questionnaire
  • Incident-notification data model
  • Supervisory triage
  • Exception queue
  • Findings and action register
  • Sector-risk reporting
  • Integration with existing supervisory records

Supervisory requirements and reporting duties vary by jurisdiction. Scope is determined with the authority; no standard regulatory platform or legal mandate is assumed.

Explore Regulatory & Supervisory Technology

A practical resilience path

From exposed dependencies to a controlled, testable operating model.

We start with how a critical service operates and work outward to the technology, people, evidence and suppliers required to protect it.

  1. Identify the essential service

    Define the processes and service levels that matter most, the sensitive data involved and what failure would interrupt.

    Critical servicesDataDependenciesBusiness impact

  2. Map and assess the exposure

    Review identity, applications, integrations, hosting, control design and third-party access against the agreed risk baseline.

    Asset inventoryThreatsAccessControl gaps

  3. Strengthen the priority controls

    Close the most material gaps through achievable changes, approved architecture and accountable change management.

    IAMHardeningLoggingSecure integration

    Digital Foundation & Portals

  4. Rehearse incident and recovery

    Test who decides, who communicates, how work continues, and how data and operations are restored safely.

    ExercisesEscalationRecoveryEvidence

  5. Measure and improve

    Build a repeatable risk view of gaps, owners, suppliers, incident lessons and tested control effectiveness.

    Risk registerActionsReportingAssurance

    Data, BI & Decision Intelligence
Cyber resilience architectureILLUSTRATIVE

Business service

Licensing portal, filing service or supervisory system

People & identity

  • Staff
  • Applicants
  • Privileged roles

Platforms & data

  • Applications
  • Hosting
  • Records

Vendors & integrations

  • Suppliers
  • APIs
  • Support access

Trust boundary and operating controls

Governance

  • Ownership
  • Risk appetite

Preventive

  • Access
  • Hardening

Monitoring

  • Logs
  • Alerts

Response

  • Escalation
  • Playbooks

Recovery

  • Restore
  • Verify

Evidence & reporting

  • Risk register
  • Action owners
  • Exercise records
  • Management view

Services & delivery

Focused cybersecurity services with a route into long-term resilience.

  • Cyber Resilience Baseline & Roadmap

    A defined current-state assessment, priority risk register, recommended target controls, named owners and a phased plan.

    • NIST CSF 2.0
    • Critical services
    • Gap assessment
    • Prioritized roadmap

  • Vulnerability & Secure Configuration Improvement

    Review configurations and exposure, agree remediation priorities and re-validate material fixes. Specialist penetration testing, if requested, must be separately scoped with appropriately qualified personnel and authorization.

    • Exposure review
    • Secure configuration
    • Remediation
    • Revalidation

  • Identity & Privileged Access

    Improve lifecycle, role boundaries, strong authentication, privileged access and separation between staff and external regulated entities.

    Digital Foundation & Portals

    • IAM
    • MFA
    • RBAC
    • Privileged access
    • Joiner/mover/leaver

  • Incident Response & Business Continuity

    Document incident roles, escalation routes, communication and restore priorities; conduct exercises and capture follow-up actions.

    • IR playbooks
    • Tabletops
    • Backups
    • Recovery testing

  • Monitoring & Security Operations Integration

    Design logging and alert workflows around existing security technologies, SIEM and provider capabilities, so identified events become owned and trackable actions.

    Workflow Automation

    • Log coverage
    • SIEM integration
    • Triage
    • Escalation
    • Evidence

  • Cyber Supervisory Workflow & Reporting

    Implement, within authorized scope, structured reporting and case management around cyber questionnaires, incidents, regulated entities, findings and remedial follow-up.

    Regulatory & Supervisory Technology

    • Secure intake
    • Supervisory workflow
    • Incident data
    • Dashboards
    • Audit trail

Standards-aware. Context-specific.

Use international guidance to ask better questions, not to claim automatic compliance.

We can use recognized cybersecurity and resilience guidance as reference points, then adapt the control plan to the institution's mandate, risk exposure, critical services and legal environment. NIST CSF 2.0 provides an accessible structure for governing, identifying, protecting, detecting, responding and recovering. IOSCO's securities-market research, outsourcing principles and FMI-specific cyber work add financial-market context. FSB's FIRE format provides an option to explore where consistent cyber and operational incident reporting is relevant.

Framework use does not constitute a certification or guarantee. The 2026 CPMI-IOSCO cyber toolkit is consultative and FMI-focused; the FSB incident format is a separate initiative.

Read the regulator's guide to cyber resilience

Prepare for what is changing, without losing focus on today's risks.

Third-party technology dependence, AI-enabled operations and the future transition to post-quantum cryptography deserve proportionate planning. For organizations with long-lived confidential information, an early inventory of cryptographic dependencies and supplier plans may be sensible. That planning should complement, not displace, basic access control, patching, recoverability and tested incident response.

Where this becomes useful

Real security questions, connected to operational outcomes.

The right scope depends on the organization, its mandate and the systems it already operates.

  1. Financial regulators & commissions

    Keep a licensing or e-filing service available, controlled and recoverable.

    A regulator's external services connect applicant accounts, staff approvals, document repositories, data stores and vendors. An interruption or unauthorized access attempt must not compromise institutional records or leave the next action unclear.

    What changes

    • Critical-service map and access-control responsibilities
    • Security event and incident escalation tied to the service owner
    • Documented restore testing and evidence for executive oversight
    Explore Regulators & Public Authorities

  2. Supervisory authorities

    Turn firm-level cyber reports into usable supervisory follow-up.

    Cyber incident notifications, questionnaires and remediation updates can arrive through different channels. Without a consistent record, supervisors may spend valuable time rebuilding context instead of prioritizing follow-up.

    What changes

    • Structured intake with appropriate data sensitivity and confidentiality
    • Entity-linked review, escalations, findings and remediation ownership
    • Cross-firm indicators and management reporting where authorized
    Explore Regulatory & Supervisory Technology

  3. Financial services

    Improve customer-data security without disrupting every existing workflow.

    Account onboarding, lending and servicing may span multiple applications and third-party services. The practical need is to identify high-risk access and information movement and build protection around the operating chain.

    What changes

    • Identity and sensitive-data flow review
    • Priority control improvements around existing platforms
    • Incident and vendor-continuity preparation
    Explore Financial Services

  4. Licensing bodies & complex public services

    Keep essential public services working even when one supplier fails.

    A single portal often depends on identity infrastructure, payment providers, document stores and hosting. Recovery requires a plan for the service as a whole, not just a backup of one server.

    What changes

    • Supplier and system dependency map
    • Service-level recovery priorities and test evidence
    • An actionable resilience backlog and responsible owners
    Explore Associations & Licensing Bodies

Engagement model

Scope the exposure. Prove the response. Expand with evidence.

  1. Understand the essential operation

    Agree the service, risk tolerance, existing controls, owners, sensitive information and boundaries of the assessment.

  2. Baseline and prioritize

    Examine available evidence, validate risks with the team, record assumptions and define a practicable improvement backlog.

  3. Implement and rehearse

    Make approved changes, integrate with current suppliers and run controlled tests and exercises under agreed rules of engagement.

  4. Transfer and improve

    Deliver runbooks, evidence, training, management reporting, known residual risks and a support or periodic assurance plan where appropriate.

Why our approach

We understand the systems security has to protect.

  • Operational context first.

    We understand the portals, regulatory records, workflows and integration dependencies around a control, not only its configuration.

  • Improvement without unnecessary replacement.

    Existing security tools, hosting arrangements and vendors are inputs to the plan, not targets for automatic replacement.

  • Security evidence that survives handover.

    We emphasize named responsibilities, tested procedures, documentation and change records rather than undocumented heroics.

  • Architecture and delivery in one conversation.

    Amayztech can assess, design, implement, integrate and support technology improvements within an agreed and appropriately resourced scope.

Questions we're asked

Do we need a mature cybersecurity team to begin?

No. We can start with one critical service and a bounded baseline review, define responsibilities and priorities, and help you establish a phased program that matches the resources available. An accountable internal owner is still required.

Can you work alongside our existing SOC, MSSP or internal IT team?

Yes. Many engagements focus on improving the gaps between security tools, service owners, suppliers, incident procedures and business operations. We do not assume your current providers should be replaced.

Do you provide vulnerability assessments and penetration testing?

We can scope vulnerability assessment and remediation work. Intrusive testing or specialist penetration testing requires explicit written authorization, defined rules of engagement and appropriately qualified delivery resources, which we confirm during scoping.

Can you help a securities commission supervise cyber risk in regulated firms?

Where the commission's legal mandate supports it, we can help design evidence collection, incident-notification workflows, supervisory questionnaires, action tracking and reporting around existing regulatory systems. The authority determines the applicable requirements and supervisory decisions.

Does IOSCO require the tools or services described here?

No universal requirement for this particular technology or service package is established by the cited IOSCO publications. They provide important international context, while local laws and an authority's mandate determine its obligations.

Is NIST CSF 2.0 suitable if we already use ISO 27001 or another framework?

It can be used as a complementary way to organize and communicate cybersecurity outcomes. We first map the frameworks, controls and assurance processes you already use rather than creating parallel paperwork without value.

How should we approach cyber incidents and reporting?

Begin with defined event classification, accountable roles, escalation, a secure record and tested response and recovery. Regulated-firm reporting requirements are jurisdiction-specific; the FSB FIRE framework can be considered for consistent data where relevant.

Can we start with a single portal or cloud application?

Yes. A bounded service review can identify authentication, hosting, integrations, access permissions, monitoring, recoverability and supplier dependencies, then propose prioritized next steps.

Can you support post-quantum preparedness?

We can discuss an initial dependency and cryptographic inventory with specialist support where needed. Claims of quantum-resistant deployment, validation or readiness depend on separately defined technical work and accepted standards.

How is the engagement priced?

Based on scope, criticality, access, environment complexity, delivery resources and testing obligations. A bounded diagnostic or blueprint is often a sensible first step before larger implementation or ongoing support.

Know what needs protecting. Decide what to strengthen next.

Whether you're establishing your cyber foundations or improving an existing program, start with one critical service or risk that deserves a clearer answer.

Discuss your resilience prioritiesBook a meeting